The definition of Science
Age of the earth:
The Lunar Dust Detector left by the Apollo 12 astronauts, more than 40 years ago is helping scientist answer a lingering lunar question: How fast does moon dust build up? The answer; it would take 1000 years for a layer of moon dust about a millimeter (0.04 inches) thick to accumulate, the researchers found. The rate may seem slow by the standards of Earth, but it’s 10 times faster than scientists had believed before, . .
If we have according to the measurements given 1 mm per 1,000 years. How many mm’s of dust is actually on the moon is hard to find out. Astronaut Neil Armstrong guesstimated it was about an eighth of an inch, or 3 mm. On this Apollo 17 photo, astronaut Harrison Schmitt is collecting moondust samples. Here it looks more like a quarter inch, or 6 mm. which would make the moon about 6,000 years old.
This is truth – now the scientific lies:
The age of the earth is estimated to be 4.6 Billion years old. Last year because of new finding it became a whopping 13.8 billion years old. Let’s take the average of 10 billion years (1000 years collect 1 mm of moondust) that is 10 million mm of moondust. That is an immense layer of 10,000 meter, or 10 km thick moondust on the moon. Crazy no? Something does not seem to add up.
Giants in the land:
It says in Genesis 6:4 “There were giants in the earth in those days” This is also regarded as total nonsense: These following skeletons came to light after heavy rainfalls in Mexico, on March 23, 2015 in Sierra Tapalpa. There is ample proof of giant skeletons, but they ‘miraculously’ disappear as quickly as they are excavated and are promptly with the utmost secrecy taken away for ‘further research’, while excavation areas are declared no-fly zone.
Truth now scientific lies brought by:
The Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. Founded in 1846, the Smithsonian is the world’s largest museum, education, and research complex to promote evolution, consisting of 19 museums and galleries, the National Zoological Park, and nine research facilities and is funded by the US government.
“the AIAA (American Institution of Alternative Archeology) states that a US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian Institution to release classified papers in 2015, dating from the early 1900′s, which show that thousands of giant human remains were ordered destroyed by high level administrators.”
Genesis 8:4 “And the ark rested . . . upon the mountains of Ararat”
It is located on the northwest corner of the Western Plateau of Mount Ararat (approximately 39°42′10″N, 44°16′30″E) at about 15,500 feet (4,724 meters), some 2.2 kilometers west of the summit. Hundreds have visited the Ark, the amount of evidence is overwhelming.
On the photo here we see Ahmet Ertugrul inside the ark, he was born in the region of Mt. Ararat. Click on photo to see list of ARK visits
Quoting Paul Zimansky, Professor of Archaeology and Ancient History, Stony Brook University. (Ph.D., University of Chicago, 1980) “I don’t know of any expedition that ever went looking for the ark and did not find it.”
Truth now lies:
Whoever would believe a silly, childish Sunday school story like this, is an naïve, brainless idiot. There was no flood, it is confused with the millions of years of ice age. We went from the late Triassic to the Early, Mid and Late Jurassic time periods, from then on to the Early and Late Cretacious periods.
Dr. Price, director of the Center for Judaic Studies, at Liberty University at Lynchburg Va. “has reason to believe, that a group of local Kurdish men had taken wood from an old structure in the Black Sea area, and trucked the wood up to the mountain and staged an elaborate hoax for the Chinese expedition.” The Chinese expedition was inside the Ark in 2009. The Black Sea is approximately 500 km from Mount Ararat.There are no roads on Ararat to truck things up the mountain, besides the Kurds are fighting a war and they don’t have time for such unbelievable nonsense.)
Hoaxes of prehistoric findings
Lucy: The remains are supposed to be 3.3 million years old .. “It’s pretty unbelievable” to find such a complete fossil from that long ago, said scientist Fred Spoor. “It’s a once-in-a lifetime find.” Spoor is professor of evolutionary anatomy at University College London.. Judging by how well it was preserved, the skeleton may have come from a body that was quickly buried by sediment in a flood, the researchers said.
It has been revealed that Lucy (Australopithecus Afarensis) had an anatomy ideally suited to climbing trees and was no different from other apes . . . The French scientific journal Science et Vie covered the story in 1999 under the headline “Adieu, Lucy”. Tel Aviv University anthropologists determined that Lucy’s lower jaw bone is some kind of gorilla jaw bone. . . As a result, the evolutionary researchers concluded that Lucy should no longer be considered man’s direct ancestor.’
Yet Lucy remains part of the big evolutionary exhibitions to promote science. But what kind of science, as science means reasoning, but sticking to the facts. Modern Science is the answer. What does Modern Science entail? Can we throw all the basic scientific principles overboard in Modern Science, so we don’t have to stick to facts anymore?
This was Lucy, but there was:
- the Piltdown Man, constructed by using the jawbone belonging to an orangutan, soaked in potassium, so it would look like a fossil.
- The Homo Neanderthalensis was the skeleton of an old gentleman who had suffered from arthritis.
- The Heidelberg man was constructed by the inspiration of a jawbone that was considered by many to be quite human. It makes you wonder what body part was used to construct the Homo Erectus?”
Cremo & Thomspon, who are both evolutionists. They state in their book The Hidden History of the Human Race. – ’The primary point we are trying to make… that there exists in the scientific community a knowledge filter that screens out unwelcome evidence.
ADAPTATIONS are confused with MUTATIONS;
Adaptations are very true, but they are “each after his kind” (Genesis 1:24,25)
- Huskies and saint Bernards have thick fur for their climates. (A Great Dane can mate a Boxer, as both are dogs)
- Polar bears and brown bears started differing in colour according to their survival needs.
- We have bred many types of cats, ducks and chickens.
- We have the humans with other human races, Some of the most beautiful and handsome people are mixed races.
MUTATIONS theory: Quoting the Smithsonian Institute, “Mutations can be caused by random errors in DNA replication or repair, or by chemical or radiation damage. Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral, but in rare instances, a mutation might prove beneficial to the organism. . . fossils are one of the central lines of evidence for evolution.”
Yet evolution is based on the assumption that all the millions or billions of mutations that have happened have been beneficial and that the bad ones died out because of NATURAL SELECTION. If it was rare to have beneficial mutations and there were millions or billions of them, then the Earth should be filled with quadrillions of fossils with harmful or neutral mutations. If “fossils are one of the central lines of evidence for evolution.” Where are they? All fossils that don’t fit evolution are rejected. However there are no fossils that support the mutation of species . . .Hence “science” has invented a new theory called ‘the hypothesis of punctuated equilibrium’.
Charles Darwin himself said, “To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances. . . could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.” Take a closer look at our brain the MAGNUM OPUS:
The fabrication that through mutation dogs can develop into horses. A sinonyx changes into a indohyus, or a tiger into a rat and frogs into birds, and that we all came from a chemical soup many millions of years ago. This is an amazing fantasy world, but no science!
You may have seen photos of the CHEMICAL MUTATIONS of Softenon babies in the seventies, and recently the RADIATION MUTATIONS of babies in Middle East warzones. Babies without arms, no legs, one eye, open insides, double heads, horrific deformities. Not in one rare instance did the mutations prove beneficial. For those interested click this links of the chilling human mutations images.
Chimpanzees and humans are closely related (sharing 95% of their DNA sequence and 99% of coding DNA sequences) Joseph Stalin financed a scientist Dr. Ivanoff with 200,000 dollars to find out if it was possible to create a human-ape hybrid, the ‘Humanzee’. Dr. Ivanoff ended up getting exiled to Siberia, because it just did not work. Remember “each after his kind”.
We are taught that “The Earth was able to support life only after the planet had cooled enough for a rocky crust to solidify” . . . . Maybe this cooling process might have taken a million years or maybe a thousand, but let’s be generous and say one hour.
In order to kill all the bacteria and amoebas and any life form in the water, science had proven that bringing it to boiling point sterilizes, it kills bacteria, viruses, protozoan’s, parasites, all life forms!
The Earth was much hotter than the boiling point of water, so even if it took only one hour to cool down, it would have completely eradicated any chance to allow any life form whatsoever to survive. Everything that might have had any chance to procreate would have been obliterated in the heat. Hence, if we go by the evolution theory, the Earth was completely sterile just like we sterilize needles, syringes and scalpels in heat.
Definition of sterile,Merriam Webster dictionary:
- not able to produce crops or plants
- not able to produce children, young animals, etc.
- not able to grow or develop
Scientists have tried for hundreds of years to develop life from non living matter and finally Louis Pasteur formulated the Law of Biogenesis stating “That life can only come from life”. This law has been criticized and contradicted, because it does not fit the evolution thought pattern of spontaneous generation. Although contradicted and criticized because of ‘advances in germ theory and cell theory’. These are all theories and no scientific experiment, not one, has proven the ‘Law of Biogenesis’ wrong.” One shred of fact and objective evidence, that it is not true, is all that is needed.
“It is what we think we know that keeps us from learning.” (Dr. Albert Einstein)
Yet we continue to be swindled and we “know” that only dumb and ignorant people believe in creation, but let’s take a look at this list of renowend scientists before we say more- click on the photo of Louis Pasteur.
We don’t need to abase ourselves to subjective, gutter-level, name calling. We don’t have to be educated scientists to shout: “Rubbish, Nonsense, Stupid idiots, Ridiculous, No-Brains, Trash, Fools, Fundamentalists, God-deluded, Bible-bashers, etc.” Any uneducated rogue can do that.
Even Charles Darwin said, “The impossibility that this grand and wondrous universe, with our conscious selves, arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for the existence of God.”
How did we get so swindled?
Dr. Einstein said there are three kinds of people
- Those who see,
- Those who see when they are shown,
- Those who do not see.
- We can add number four, There are none so blind, as those who refuse to see.
- Marie Curie added the fifth, when she stated: “There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors instead of establishing the truth.”
It is the fifth, the last and lowest level, which is doing the most damage to the reputation of science.
Here is just one example and then we will leave the rest: The Yonaguni underwater city: The Yonaguni site consists of huge stone blocks which fit together perfectly, right angled joins, carvings and what appear to be stairways, paved streets, crossroads and plazas. Despite the unusual features displayed, there remain some scientists, such as Geologist Robert Schoch of Boston University, who have studied the formation and who are adamant that the large blocks formed naturally as a result of tectonic movement.
It is proclaimed that the evolution theory is something of the last few hundred years, after Charles Darwin and since then science has progressed. Science has progressed but evolution has been around a long time. The prophet Jeremiah wrote 2500 years ago; “Who say to a tree, you are my father; and to a stone, you have brought me forth.” (Jeremiah 2:7) Isn’t this the same thing that we are trying to teach our children with creating more and more ‘scientific theories’, scrambling frantically to prove evolution to be “true”?
MODERN “SCIENCE” will develop MORE NEW THEORIES with highly complicated and difficult to understand terminology. It will be a language that we don’t understand so we give up reading, thinking we must be not be intelligent enough, as we don’t understand all these complicated theories and names. For example we have: Gharialis Curvirostris, Palaeoloxodon Namadicus, Dittmarites Trailliformis, Orthis (Plectorthis) Spitiensis, Spriferina Stracheyi, Achrochordiceras Balarama, Cyathophyllum Helianthoides, Hemiptychina Crebriplicata, and then we have the Australopithecus Africanus, which means the African Monkey. My question is, “Does anyone really know what they are talking about, or are we playing hide and seek in a maze of illogical, complicated, not understandable vocabulary and theories?
Adolf Hitler sums it all up in ‘Mein Kampf’.
“It would never come into the heads of the broad masses to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. . . . They will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world.”
Hitler is saying if you tell a lie, tell a big one. Keep repeating it, and they will believe you, because no one would think that you had the nerve to tell something so big if it was not the truth.